بررسی جامعه شناختی تعریف امنیت ملی دولت ها در عصرجهانی شدن

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه علوم سیاسی ، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تبریز، ایران

10.30495/jss.2021.1926080.1318

چکیده

ازآنجایی که جهانی شدن فرآیند اقتصادی سیاسی و اجتماعی بوده وحاصل فشرده شدن زمان و مکان میباشد بطوری که گفتمان ارتباطات را تحلیل برده و فاصله ها را به هم نزدیکتر و حاکمیت و امنیت ملی دولتها را تحت تاثیر قرارداده است و تاثیرات حاصل از آن منجر به کاهش یا تغییر ظرفیت و توانایی دولت در برابر فشار ریسک بین الملل و منطق های شده است افزایش یاکاهش قدرت دولتها تغییر ظرفیت آنها توانمندی یا عدم توانمندی و تغییر محورهای تعارضات و کشمکش بین المللی و منطق های،گفتمان های مطرح در امنیت ملی دولتها که متشکل از گفتمان سنتی مدرن و پست مدرنیستی بوده و شاخص های آن یعنی مشروعیت سیاسی،امنیت سیاسی و یکپارچگی سیاسی را تحت تاثیر و منجر به باز تعریف امنیت ملی فوق دولتها در نهایت براساس باز تعریف فوق،دولتها را به چهار گروه 1- قدرتهای بزرگ 2- کشورهای موجود در مناطق باثبات 3- کشورهای موجود درمناطق بحران خیز مداوم 4- کشورهای ضعیف و شکست خورده مقوله بندی نمودهاست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Sociological study of the definition of national security of governments in the age of globalization

نویسنده [English]

  • Parviz Ahadi
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

The globalization is a social, political and economic process and is the result of the integration of time and space in such a way that it has weakened the communication discourse and diminished the differences and leading to the sovereignty and security of the nations. These changes have diminished or changed the govetnment's ability and capacity against regional and international pressures. The raise or reduction in the government's power, a change in their capacity , ability or disability and in the regional and international conflicts and struggles, the negotiations in the national security which is a combination of modern-traditional discourse and post-modernism and its political legitimacy have influenced political security and integration. These changes have led to the classification of the country into four groups of 1) big powers, 2) the presence of countries in the stable regions, 3) the countries in crisis regions, and 4) weak and defeated countries..

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • National Security
  • governments
  • The World Age
-          Giddens Anthony (1991) the consequences of modernity, Polity press, Cambridgep.(70-78)
-          PaehlkeRobert , Globalization, Interdependence and Sustainability, Trent university, peter borough, Ontario, Canada, Encyclopedia of life support(EOLSS) p.(1-5)
-          RennJugen, The Globalization of knowledge and its consumes, 30sep2012 ,tlelge wen DT / Dept.1(1-5)
-          Jagdish N. SHeth, Globalization of markets and the rule of three, Emory university, 28 July 2016, p.(2-6)
-          JessopBob , Globalization and national state, department if sociology at Lancaster university December 2003
-          SoborskiRofal, Globalization and Ideology: Napping the shifting Debate, Book metrix
-          SoborskiRofal, Ideology in a global age, frontiers of globalization series, p.(136), springer link Richmand university, UK, 2013 palgraveMacmillan, London
-          RaikhanSadyKova, the interaction of Globalization and culhne in the modern world, science direct, procedia-socialand behavioral seiences 122(2014) 8-12, p.(1-10)
-          Sucer Ahmet, Technology,  globalization and social Development GE 301 seience technology and society, p.(5-7)
-          Bilgin Pinar, globalization and in / security middle eastern Encaunters with International society, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 24 Dec 2012
-          IDLER, EMANUEL, AND MICHAEL BARNETT. (1998) Security Community. Cambridge University Press
-          AMI INTERNATIONAL. (2001) Egypt. Available at http://www. Amiinter /samples/ Egypt/general.html. (Accessed June 19,2003)
-          ANDREAS, PETER, AND RICHARD PRICE. (2001) From War Fighting to Crime Fighting: Transforming the American National Security State. International studies review 3(3):31-52
-          ARGENYINA. (n.d.) White Paper on National Defense. Parts I-IV. Available at http://www.defensenet. Ser2000.org.ar/Archivo/Libro-argentina-eng/. (Accessed June 8, 2003)
-          AVALON, PROJECT. (2003) Arab League Charter. New Haven: Yale Law School. Available at http : // www . yale .edu /lawweb /avalon /mideast /arableag .htm. (Accessed June 19, 2003)
-          AYDINLI.ERSEL, AND JAMES N. ROSENAU. (2004) Courage Versus Caution: A Dialogue on Entering and Prospering in IR. International Studies Review 6(3):511-526
-          AYOOB, MOHAMMED. (1997) Defining Security: A Subaltern Realist Perspective. In Critical Security studies, edited by Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
-          BALDWIN, DAVID A., ED. (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
-          BRAZIL, DOCTRINE. (2002) Available at Global Security website: htty://www.globalsecutity.org/military/word/brazil/doctrine.htm. (Accessed June 8, 2003)
-          BUSH, GEORGE W. (2002) the National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: White House.
-          CARR, EDWARD H. (1946) theTwenty Years Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. New York: Harper and Row.
-          CHA, VICTOR. (2000) Globalization and the Study of National Security. Journal of Peace Research 37:391-403
-          CILLERS, JAKKIE, AND OEGGY MASON, EDS (1999)Peace Profit, or Plunder? The Privatization of security in War-torn African Societies. Defense in 2002. Sections I, II, VI. Available at the People's Daily website: http://www.english.Peopledaily.com .cn/features/ndper2002/. (   Accessed May 28, 2003)
-          CLAY MENDEZ, DEBORAH. (1995) Public and Private Roles in Maintaining Military Equipment at Depot Level. Washington, DC: Congressional budget Offuce.